Run the entire transaction in one place. Prove every step of it.
A data room holds one side’s documents. apokto runs the deal itself — diligence, Q&A, bids, committee, close, and everything after it. Buyer, seller, counsel, bankers and accountants work in the same record, and every action in it is provable to an outside party.
Twelve transaction types
Buy-side, sell-side, credit, fund and LP work — one platform, not four tools.
Every party in one room
Counterparties and advisors get scoped seats. No shared logins, no side channels.
Custody you control
Six modes up to air-gapped. Your keys, lease-gated decrypt, witnessed break-glass.
Kurt, scoped to one deal
Drafts memos and Q&A with citations. Cannot read across a wall, and says so.
| PROCESS | FUND | STAGE | NEXT GATE | OPEN | EXPOSURE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian HealthAPK-M-114 | IV | DD | Bids 08 May | 3 | $432M |
| Kestrel add-on | IV | IOI | Mgmt call 12 May | 1 | $85M |
| Helios continuation | V | ELEC | LP vote 19 May | 2 | $210M |
| Argent exit · sell-side | III | MP1 | CIM out 16 May | — | $160M |
| Fund V raise · IR | V | DDQ | ODD onsite 21 May | 1 | — |
Firm risk · now
Transactions
Twelve transaction types. One record underneath all of them.
Firms run these on four or five disconnected systems today, and re-key the same numbers between them. Here they share one graph, so a close event can build the capital call and a DDQ can answer itself from the record.
Who buys it
Four people have to say yes. Each one gets a straight answer.
Deal Partner
What is the disputed EBITDA actually costing us?
The QofE bridge prices it in the room: $6.2M in dispute is $71M of price at 11.4×. Kurt has the cited IC memo ready before committee.
See the bridge →Deal Ops
Can we prove the auction was run fairly?
Every fan-out, redaction set and normalization step exports as receipts a losing bidder's counsel can check independently.
See the fan-out →Security Review
Who at the vendor can read our MNPI?
Nobody. Decrypt is lease-gated against your keys, break-glass is witnessed by every party, and the full architecture goes to you before the first call.
Read the architecture →Fund Operations
Why is ops re-keying the close into the capital call?
It shouldn't be. The close event builds the call: 38 notices generated, side letters checked mechanically, wire details frozen weeks ahead.
See the close →Kurt
The analyst work, done overnight. Cited line by line.
Kurt drafts memos, bridges and Q&A responses under the same custody rules as any human seat. Every figure carries a document citation or a flag saying it is reasoning, not evidence. It works inside one deal and cannot see the next one — ask it to cross a wall and the refusal is recorded in writing.
Meridian gross churn is 9.1% TTM — SMB 14.2%, enterprise 3.8%. DOC-0872 p.12 QA-0121
Kestrel is a separate vault and I can’t read it from this seat — that wall is yours, not ours. Ask me inside Kestrel, or use an approved precedent instead.
Reasoning — not cited
SMB-weighted churn at this NRR usually reprices around 0.5× in committee.